1. Guide line for Submission and Publishing of Articles
About the content. The article should contain only original material, reflecting the results of the author's research, not previously published and not directed to other publications.
On consideration of the submitted materials. At the first stage all scientific articles undergo mandatory testing for borrowings. Articles containing less than 70 %
of the unique text and violating publishing requirements are returned to the author (authors). Articles that have passed the verification of the uniqueness of the text
and following the journal profile are sent to the editorial board for reviewing. The comments are transmitted to the author (authors). After the finalization,
the reviewers analyze the materials again, after which the decision for publication is made.
To the article (with the signature of the author (authors)) is enclosed an expert conclusion on the possibility of open publication.
On the format. The article should be typed in the text editor Word (with the extension *.doc or *.docx) (font — Times New Roman Cyr 14 pt, indentation — 0,5 cm,
line spacing — one and a half, without hyphenation in words). Print on paper in A4 format (210×297 mm). Pages should be numbered with a pencil on the back. The volume of the article
is 16–18 pages, including figures and tables (without taking into account annotations, keywords, list of sources and information about the author (authors)).
Margins: from above and from below — on 2,5 cm; left and right — 2 cm.
Header. In the upper left corner of the sheet is placed UDC. Further, in the center, the title of the article is printed (the capital letter is only the first). The title of the article
can not be abbreviated. Below are the initials, the author's (authors') surname, the line below is the full name of the organization, followed by a comma — country, city, street name,
house number, postcode.
Below the line the text of the annotation and keywords in Russian are placed.
The Abstract should reflect the main topic of the article, its relevance, purpose and objectives, as well as its results. In the annotation, the author (authors) indicates
that the new work carries this work in comparison with others related to the topic and purpose. The recommended average annotation volume is from 500 characters.
Keywords — 6–8 words/phrases. It should reflect the specifics of the topic, the object and the results of the study.
Next, the main text of the article is placed through the line.
The text of the article should be structured and contain the following sections: «Introduction», «Statement of the problem», «Theory», «Experimental results», «Discussion of experiments»,
The «Introduction» section includes the relevance of the research topic, a review of the literature on the research topic (the initial hypotheses, if they exist), the object of the study,
the statement of the problem.
The Statement of the problem should follow from the results of the literature review and contain the formulated goal and a list of tasks to be solved.
The section «Theory» contains theoretical analysis and theoretical studies.
The sections «Results of experiments» and «Discussion of results» contain the actual results of the research (text, tables, graphs, diagrams, equations, figures)
and interpretation of the results of the research, respectively.
The section «Conclusions» contains brief summaries of the sections of the article without repeating the formulations given in them.
The line below is, if any, Acknowledgments.
Formulas. Simple inline and single-line formulas that do not contain special characters (absent on the keyboard) must be typed with symbols from the keyboard without using special editors.
Single special characters that are not present on the keyboard, formulas that contain special characters that are not on the keyboard, and complex and multi-line formulas must be typed entirely
in the Microsoft Equation 3.0 formula editor. It is not allowed to type part of the formula with symbols, and parts in the formula editor. If in the text of the article the formulas are numbered,
then this numbering should be performed by a set of numbers. Automatic numbering is not allowed.
List of sources. Below the main text, the title «List of sources» is printed down the line and a numbered source list is placed through the line in the order of the text references
in accordance with the current editorial requirements for the bibliographic description. Only one source of information should be indicated in one item of the list.
Number of references to information sources — at least 15–20 sources:
— obligatory citation of modern works (the share of quoted publications published on the subject of the article is estimated over the past 5 years);
— the existence of a balance between references to domestic and foreign publications (shows how much the author (authors) of the manuscript know the current state of the problem in Russia and abroad);
–— the share of links to the articles of the author (authors) published earlier should not exceed 25 % of the total number of references.
References to information sources are numbered sequentially, as far as they are mentioned in the text, and are denoted by numbers enclosed in square brackets (for example, ).
If the reference to the source of information in the article is mentioned repeatedly, then its number from the list is repeated in square brackets (without using the next sequence number
and the link «Ibid» in the Source list). When referring to different materials from the same source, the page number is also indicated in square brackets each time, for example, [1, p. 17] or [1, p. 28–29].
Tables are placed on a new page after the Source List. The numbering of tables is made in the order of the references in the text. The numbering header of the table is typed in a font with boldface,
aligned to the left.
Table names are given simultaneously in Russian and English:
Table 1. Name in Russian
Table 1. Title of the table in English
The reference to the table in the main text is drawn in a font with boldface in parentheses — for example, (Table 1).
No more than 8–10 tables are allowed.
Figures are sequentially placed on a new page after the tables (or the Source list). The numbering of figures is made in the order of the references in the text. The numbering header
is typed in a font with boldface, aligned to the center of the picture.
The names of the figure are given simultaneously in Russian and English:
Fig. 1. Name in Russian
Fig. 1. Title of the figure in Russian
The reference to the figure in the main text is made in a font with boldface and in parentheses — for example, (Fig. 1). Figures can be scanned from the original (with a resolution
of 300 dpi in grayscale) or executed by means of computer graphics and saved in the formats JPEG, TIFF, BMP, PSD. The file size of the figure should not exceed 3 MB. The use of graphics
in MS Visio format, various CAD and other programs is not allowed. Figures should be clear. All positions in the figure must be decoded and described. The legend of the figure should be easy to read,
the font is not less than 8–9 pt. It is allowed, and in the case of illustrations of a large volume (file), the placement of pictures in a separate electronic version file is welcome. The name of the figure
is placed directly under the figure and should not be included in the format of the figure.
No more than 8–10 figure are allowed.
On the last page, indicate the following information about the author (authors): surname, name, scientific degree; academic degree, academic title, position, telephone number (not published);
address for correspondence; for nonresident authors — the postal address to which the journal is sent in case of publication of their article.
A separate page contains the English-language part of the article.
In the upper left corner of the sheet in English, the UDC is affixed (UDC). Further, in the center, the title of the article is printed (the capital letter is only the first) in English.
Below in English — initials, author (authors) surname, the line below — the full name of the organization, followed by a comma — country, city, street name, house number, postcode.
The line below is an Abstract and Keywords.
The Abstract should be informative, reflect the main content of the article and the results of the research. The volume is 100–250 words. It should not be a literal translation of the Russian version.
Keywords are placed under the annotation — 6–8 words/phrases. It should reflect the specifics of the topic, the object and the results of the study.
The line below is, if any, Acknowledgments.
The line below is the List of Sources in Latin, called References.
Description of References:
1. Authors (Surname, Name, Second Name) — transliteration.
2. The title of the article is transliteration.
3. The title of the article in English in square brackets.
4. The title of the publication is transliteration.
5. Name of the publication in English.
6. Imprint: place of publication, year, number, pages — in English.
7. At the end of the link in parentheses, indicate the source language in English, for example, (In Russ.).
After References the following information about the author (authors) in English is placed: surname, name, patronymic (transliteration); academic degree, academic title,
position; address for correspondence.
For transliteration use the standard BGN (United States Board on Geographic Names).
It is necessary to submit a printed version of the article (with a personal signature of the author (authors)) and an electronic version of the article (send by e-mail: email@example.com),
the original expert conclusion on the possibility of open publication and author agreement.
Address: 644050, Omsk, Mira Ave., 11, Building 6, Office 424, OmSTU, the Editorial Board of the journal Omsk Scientific Bulletin.
Tel. +7(3812) 65-32-08, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
The system of online reception of the articles is available: http://onv.omgtu.ru/article.php
2. Guideline for Reviewing Manuscripts. The procedure of reviewing
Articles submitted to the editor should match the profile of the journal.
Submitted by the author manuscript according to scientific research topics is sent for reviewing to the members of the editorial board in charge of this topic, and experts which are scientists
and specialists in this field of science (Dr., PhD). All reviewers are acknowledged experts on the subject of peer-reviewed material and have relative publications for the past three years.
Reviewers are notified that the manuscripts are the private property of the authors and are not subject to disclosure.
The review shall be conducted confidentially. The review is confidential. The author of the manuscript provided a copy of the review, or a reasoned refusal, without a signature and the name,
position, place of work the reviewer. A copy of the review can be provided upon request to the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.
Confidentiality disclosure is only possible in the case of statements the reviewer of invalidation or falsification of material contained in the manuscript.
If the review indicates the need to fix the manuscript, the one is sent to the author for revision. The author should make all necessary changes in the final version of the manuscript and return
the corrected text to the editor, as well as its revised electronic version and a cover letter — a response to the reviewer. The revised article is reviewed again, and the editors decide on the possibility of publication.
In case of disagreement with the opinion of the reviewer of the manuscript the author has the opportunity to give a reasonable response to the journal. The manuscript can be directed
to additional review or to the editorial board for approval.
The decision on publishing the manuscript after review is made by chief editor (deputy of chief editor), and if necessary by the editorial board.
Journal does not give information concerning the manuscript (including information on its receiving, content, review process, reviewers' criticisms and the final decision) to anyone other
than the authors and reviewers. Reviewers are not allowed to make copies of the manuscript for their needs. Reviewers and editorial staff have no right to use the information about the contents
of the work before it will be published on their own interests.
Reviews of manuscripts are to be stored by the journal editorial for five years from the date of publication of the articles.
The review can be presented in the form of expert profiles approved by the editorial board.
3. Requirements for the review
The review should include a qualified analysis of the material of the manuscript, objective assessment and reasonable recommendations.
The review should give special attention to highlighting the following issues:
— A general analysis of scientific level, terminology, structure of manuscript, relevance to the topic;
— Assessment of readiness of the manuscript for publication in respect to the language and style, meeting the journal requirements;
— Scientific exposition used by the author matches methods, techniques, advice and research achievements of modern science and practice;
— The admissibility of the volume of the manuscript as a whole and its individual elements (text, tables, pictures, bibliographic references); the feasibility of space in the article tables,
illustrations and their compliance with the stated theme; recommendations for reasonable reductions in manuscript (indicate by which element);
— Place the manuscript under review among others published on this topic: what's new in it, or how it differs from others, whether manuscript duplicates the work of other authors
or previously published works of the author (in whole or in part);
— find incorrect statements and errors.
The reviewer should provide guidance to the author and editors to improve the manuscript. Comments and suggestions of the reviewer should be objective and global aimed at improving scientific
and methodological levels of the manuscript.
The final part of the review assesses of the manuscript as a whole and a gives clear recommendation for reasonability of manuscript publication in the journal.
In case of negative review the reviewer should justify conclusions especially convincing.